(PS) Aetius v. Triple Canopy ( 2022 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 AUGUSTUS AETIUS, No. 2:21-cv-02120-TLN-KJN 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14 TRIPLE CANOPY, 15 Defendant. 16 17 On March 16, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 18 5), which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice that any objections to the findings 19 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. (ECF No. 5.) No objections 20 were filed. 21 Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. 22 United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 23 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 24 1983). 25 The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, 26 concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the findings and recommendations in full. Accordingly, 27 /// 28 /// 1 | ITIS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The Findings and Recommendations (ECF No. 5) are adopted in full; 3 2. Plaintiffs claims are DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4(m); and 4 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 5 | DATED: May 20, 2022 6 8 “ Mn / 9 Troy L. Nuhlep> 10 United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28