(HC) Garcia v. The People of the State of California ( 2023 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ARMANDO JOSEPH GARCIA, No. 2:15-cv-2441 MCE AC P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER 14 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed an application for a writ of habeas 18 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 19 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On March 22, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 21. Neither 23 party filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 25 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 26 See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). The Court has 27 reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and 28 1 | by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 3 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 22, 2023 (ECF No. 21), are 4 | ADOPTED in full; 5 2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED; 6 3. The court declines to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. 7 | § 2253; and 8 4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 Dated: May 3, 2023 Mates LEK hu rfl ASX, Xe: 2 SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28