Brooke v. Sai Ashish Inc. ( 2022 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 THERESA BROOKE, Case No. 1:21-cv-00967-AWI-SAB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING WHY MONETARY 13 v. SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT ISSUE FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY 14 SAI ASHISH INC., DEADLINE: MAY 31, 2022 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 Plaintiff Theresa Brooke initiated this action on June 17, 2021. (ECF No. 1.) On April 19 30, 2022, the parties submitted a notice of settlement. (ECF No. 37.) On May 2, 2022, the Court 20 issued an order vacating all matters and requiring the parties to file dispositional documents by 21 May 23, 2022. (ECF No. 38.) The deadline to file dispositional documents has expired, but 22 nothing has been filed. 23 Local Rule 110 provides that “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with these Rules 24 or with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all 25 sanctions . . . within the inherent power of the Court.” The Court has the inherent power to 26 control its docket and may, in the exercise of that power, impose sanctions where appropriate, 27 including dismissal of the action. Bautista v. Los Angeles Cnty., 216 F.3d 837, 841 (9th Cir. 28 2000). 1 The Court shall require the parties to show cause why monetary sanctions should not issue 2 | for the failure to file dispositional documents in compliance with its May 2, 2022 order. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The parties shall show cause in writing no later than May 31, 2022, why 5 monetary sanctions should not issue for the failure to file dispositional documents 6 as required by the May 2, 2022 order; and 7 2. Failure to comply with this order will result in the issuance of sanctions. 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. DAM Le 10 | Dated: _May 24, 2022 _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28