(PC) Michael A. Yocom v. County of Tulare ( 2023 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL ALAN YOCOM, Case No. 1:21-cv-00849-HBK (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY COURT SHALL NOT DIMISS THIS ACTION FOR 13 v. PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO PROSEUCTE THIS ACTION AND/OR COMPLY WITH A 14 COUNTY OF TULARE, et al., COURT ORDER 15 Defendants. AUGUST 21, 2023, DEADLINE 16 17 This matter comes before the Court upon periodic review of the file. Plaintiff Michael 18 Yocum, a state prisoner appearing, initiated this action by filing a pro se civil rights complaint 19 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on May 26, 2021. (Doc. No. 1). Plaintiff did not accompany his 20 complaint with the $402.00 filing fee or an application requesting to proceed in forma pauperis 21 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. On June 2, 2021, the Court ordered Plaintiff, within thirty (30) 22 days to submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the $402.00 filing fee. (Doc. 23 No. 3). The Court expressly warned Plaintiff that a failure to comply with the June 2, 2021 Order 24 will result in a dismissal of this action. (Id.). As of the date of this Order, Plaintiff has not 25 submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis or paid the filing fee. See docket. 26 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) permits courts to involuntarily dismiss an action 27 when a litigant fails to prosecute an action or fails to comply with a court order. See Fed. R. Civ. 28 P. 41(b); see Applied Underwriters v. Lichtenegger, 913 F.3d 884, 889 (9th Cir. 2019) (citations eI III RU ENE NEI III OS SIE II IRI OSI IE 1 | omitted); Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005) 2 | (“[T]he consensus among our sister circuits, with which we agree, is that courts may dismiss 3 | under Rule 41(b) sua sponte, at least under certain circumstances.”). Local Rule 110 similarly 4 | permits courts to impose sanctions on a party who fails to comply with a court order. 5 Before dismissing this action, the Court will afford Plaintiff an opportunity to show cause 6 | why the Court should not dismiss this action for Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute this action and/or 7 || failure to comply with a court order.! In the alternative, Plaintiff may file an application to 8 | proceed in forma pauperis or pay the $402.00 filing fee. Because no defendant has yet been 9 | served, Plaintiff may choose to file a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal without prejudice under 10 | Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) if he no longer wishes to prosecute this action. 11 Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 12 1. No later than August 21, 2023, Plaintiff shall deliver to correctional officials for 13 mailing his response to the Order to Show Cause. 14 2. Alternatively, by the same date, Plaintiff must deliver an application to proceed in 15 forma pauperis along with a prison trust account statement reflecting the 6 months of 16 transactions in his prison account; or (2) pay the $402.00 filing fee. 17 3. If Plaintiff fails to timely comply with this order, or request an extension by showing 18 good cause, the undersigned will recommend the Court dismiss this case for □□□□□□□□□□□ 19 failure to comply with a court order and/or prosecute this action. 20 | Dated: _ July 31,2023 Mihaw. Wh. foareh fackte 22 HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA 33 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 24 25 □□ ' Further, the Court cannot conduct a proper screening on Plaintiff's Complaint under 28 U.S.C. §1915A 27 | until he submits an application to proceed in forma pauperis or pays the filing fee The Complaint alleges a medical deliberate indifference claim and an access to court claim. (See generally Doc. No. 1). □□□□ 28 preliminary review of the Complaint, the undersigned finds it fails to state a cognizable claim.