Geo Guidance Drilling Services, Inc. v. Renaissance Resources, LLC ( 2023 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GEO GUIDANCE DRILLING Case No. 1:20-cv-00465-CDB SERVICES, INC., 12 ORDER RENEWING REQUIREMENT Plaintiff, FOR PARTIES TO FILE 13 DISPOSITIONAL DOCUMENTS v. 14 (Docs. 71-73) RENAISSANCE RESOURCES, LLC, 15 SEVEN-DAY DEADLINE Defendant. 16 17 18 On July 7, 2023, the Court ruled on a motion by Defendant Renaissance Resources, LLC 19 (“Renaissance”) and approved the parties’ proffered good faith settlement pursuant to California 20 Code of Civil Procedure section 877.6. (Docs. 70, 71). Concurrent with the filing of its order, 21 the Court entered the parties’ stipulated judgment. (Doc. 72). The Court ordered the parties to 22 file dispositional documents by no later than July 28, 2023. (Id., citing E.D. Cal. Local Rule 23 160(b)). 24 Instead of timely filing documents disposing of this action as directed, on July 28, 2023, 25 Plaintiff Geo Guidance Drilling Services, Inc. (“Geo”) filed a “Statement of Disposition.” (Doc. 26 73). In its statement, Geo represents that the judgment award has not been satisfied and that 27 Renaissance “intends to pursue third-party action for purposes of attempting to recover an award sufficient to satisfy” the judgment award. (Id. ¶ 7). 1 Notwithstanding that the Court specifically retained jurisdiction for a period of time over 2 | the judgment and any subsequent enforcement action or actions to enforce the terms of the 3 | parties’ settlement agreement (Doc. 72), the parties’ apparent intention to delay filing a 4 | stipulation of dismissal until the judgment award is satisfied does not constitute good cause for an 5 | extension under Local Rule 160(b). Since it is clear from the parties’ filings and the entry of 6 | judgment that the claims raised in this action were settled, the claims are subject to dismissal 7 | under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2). See Eitel vy. McCool, 782 F.2d 1470, 1472-73 8 | (9th Cir. 1986). 9 The Court declines to order dismissal with prejudice at this juncture as it is apparent the 10 | parties have worked diligently to reach a negotiated resolution and the Court has retained 11 | jurisdiction over the settlement terms for a limited period. Instead, the Court will grant the parties 12 || seven additional days to meet and confer prior to filing an appropriate stipulation for dismissal 13 | pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A) (Gi). 14 CONCLUSION AND ORDER 15 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, the parties shall file a stipulation of dismissal 16 | pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(Gi) within seven days of entry of this order. 17 | IT IS SO ORDERED. 'S Dated: _ July 31, 2023 | br Pr 19 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28