(PC) Ramos v. Rocha ( 2022 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL AJURIA RAMOS, No. 2:19-cv-0726 TLN KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS 14 I. ROCHA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 By order filed March 22, 2022, plaintiff was granted sixty days to file a pretrial statement. 18 Plaintiff has not filed a pretrial statement or otherwise responded to the court’s order. The court 19 will therefore recommend that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 20 16(f); Local Rule 110. 21 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 22 1. Defendants are relieved from filing a pretrial statement. 23 2. The pretrial conference set for August 1, 2022, is vacated; and 24 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See 25 Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f); Local Rule 110. 26 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 27 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 28 after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 1 | objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 2 || “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 3 || objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 4 || parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 5 || appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 6 || Dated: May 25, 2022 Foci) Aharon 8 KENDALL J. NE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 || 4am00726.fp12 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28