Beaumont RV, Inc. v. Carbon Emery RV, Inc. ( 2023 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BEAUMONT RV, INC., Case No. 1:22-cv-00073-JLT-HBK A California Corporation, 12 VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL UNDER FED. R. Plaintiff, CIV. P. 41 (a)(1)(A)(ii) 13 v. COURT RETAINS JURISDICTION TO 14 ENFORCE SETTLEMENT CARBON EMERY RV, INC., 15 a Utah Corporation, (Doc. No. 27) 16 Defendant. 17 18 On July 30, 2023, Plaintiff Beaumont RV. Inc. and Defendant Carbon Emery RV, Inc. 19 (collective the “Parties”) filed a Stipulation of Dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 20 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). (Doc. No. 27, “Stipulation”). The Parties state they are voluntarily dismissing 21 this action and each party shall bear its own fees and costs. (Id.). The Parties expressly request 22 the Court to retain jurisdiction over this matter to enforce the settlement agreement between the 23 Parties. (Id). 24 Considering the Stipulation, this action is terminated by operation of law without further 25 order from the Court. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Because the Stipulation does not state 26 otherwise, the dismissal is deemed without prejudice. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(B). As 27 specifically requested by the Parties, the Court retains jurisdiction for purposes of enforcing the 28 settlement agreement. See Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 511 U.S. 375, 380-82 1 } (1994). 2 ACCORDINGLY, the Clerk of Court shall terminate all pending motions and deadlines 3 | and CLOSE this action to reflect the Parties’ stipulated voluntary dismissal pursuant to Rule 4 | 41(a)(1)(A)Gi) without prejudice and note the Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the settlement 5 | agreement. 6 Dated: _ July 31,2023 Mihaw. □□ fareh Zacks 8 HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA 9 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28