(PC)Ramirez v. Francisco ( 2023 )

een ne eee II III I IEE IE ID EINE ee 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 | ISRAEL MALDONADO RAMIREZ, Case No. 1:23-cv-00162-JLT-HBK (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR COPIES 13 v. (Doc. No. 9) 14 | FRANCISCO, ET AL., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs construed motion for copies.! (Doc. No. 9). Plaintiffs 18 | request for copies should be directed to the clerk’s office. Plaintiff is advised that his pro se status does 19 | not entitle him to receive complimentary copies. Blair v. CDCR, 2018 WL 1959532, at *6 n.2 (E.D. Cal. 20 Apr. 25, 2018). Consistent with statute, the clerk provides copies of documents and the docket sheet at 21 | $0.50 per page. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914. Checks in the exact amount are payable to “Clerk, USDC.” 22 Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 23 Plaintiff’s motion for copies is DENIED. (Doc. No. 9). Dated: _ May 9.2023 Wiha Th. Doareh Hack 25 HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 ——— ' Plaintiff titles his request for relief as an “Affidavit.” A request for a court order requesting any relief 28 must be made by motion. Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(b).