(PC) Bullard v. Sacramento Police Department ( 2023 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RONDELL DONTA BULLARD, No. 2:22-cv-1914 KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER & FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS 14 SACRAMENTO POLICE DEPARTMENT, 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 By order filed November 30, 2022, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days 19 leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty-day period has expired, and plaintiff 20 has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 21 Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the order was returned, plaintiff 22 was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current 23 address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of 24 the party is fully effective. 25 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is 26 directed to assign a district judge to this case; and 27 //// 28 //// ] IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 2 | 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 3 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 4 | assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).. Within fourteen after 5 || being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with 6 || the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and 7 || Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time 8 | waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 9 | 1991). 10 || Dated: January 4, 2023 Aectl Aharon 12 KENDALL J.NE /bull1914.fta UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28