Cantu v. Kings County ( 2023 )


Menu:
  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROGER CANTU, et al., Case No. 1:20-cv-00538-JLT-SAB 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING WHY SANCTIONS 13 v. SHOULD NOT ISSUE FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COURT ORDER 14 KINGS COUNTY, et al., (ECF No. 51) 15 Defendants. DEADLINE: SEPTEMBER 29, 2023 16 17 On August 15, 2023, the parties filed a notice of settlement of this entire action. (ECF 18 No. 51.) The filing noted that this action requires the filing of a petition for minor’s 19 compromise, that the parties anticipated filing such petition within thirty (30) days, and 20 requested a status conference be set in approximately 90 days, if the Court was inclined. On 21 August 16, 2023, the Court set a deadline of thirty (30) days to file the petition for minor’s 22 compromise, however, noted that if the parties require additional time, they may file a stipulated 23 request demonstrating good cause. The Court did not find it necessary to set a status conference. 24 The deadline to file a petition for minor’s compromise has expired and the parties have not filed 25 such petition nor requested an extension of time to do so. 26 The Court has the inherent power to control its docket and may, in the exercise of that 27 power, impose sanctions where appropriate, including dismissal of the action. Bautista v. Los Angeles Cnty., 216 F.3d 837, 841 (9th Cir. 2000). The Court shall require the parties to show 1 | cause why sanctions should not issue for the failure to file the petition, and concurrently make 2 | any needed request for an extension of time to file such petition. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The parties shall show cause in writing no later than September 29, 2023, why 5 sanctions should not issue for the failure to comply with the Court’s order issued 6 August 16, 2023, requiring the parties to file the petition for minor’s compromise; 7 and 8 2. Failure to comply with this order will result in the issuance of sanctions. 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. DAM Le | Dated: _September 26, 2023 _ ef UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Document Info

Docket Number: 1:20-cv-00538

Filed Date: 9/26/2023

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/20/2024