Sarnowski v. Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. ( 2022 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSEPH SARNOWSKI, ) Case No.: 1:21-cv-01568-JLT-BAK (SKO) ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ORDER CLOSING THE CASE ) 13 v. ) (Doc. 18) ) 14 SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, ) INC., 15 ) ) 16 Defendant. ) 17 The parties have stipulated to the action, including all claims and counterclaims, being 18 dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), with each 19 party to bear its own attorney’s fees and costs. (Doc. 18.) The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 20 41 makes such stipulations effective immediately without further order of the Court. Wilson v. City of 21 San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close 22 this action. 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 Dated: June 15, 2022 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto . 26 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 28