(PC) Montgomery v. Social Security Administration ( 2022 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JONLYNN S. MONTGOMERY, No. 2:22-cv-0525 CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND 14 SOCIAL SECURITY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ADMINISTRATION, 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 By order filed May 27, 2022, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty-days leave to 19 file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has 20 not filed an amended complaint. 21 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that that Clerk of the Court assign a district 22 court judge to this case; and 23 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See 24 Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 25 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 26 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen after 27 being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with 28 the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and 1 | Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time 2 || waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 4 | Dated: July 6, 2022 Card ke yy a 5 CAROLYN K DELANEY? 6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9} 1 10 mont0525.fta 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28