(HC) Salazar v. Pfeiffer ( 2022 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RAYMOND JOSEPH SALAZAR, No. 2:20-cv-1000 KJM AC P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER 14 CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas 18 corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as 19 provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On March 8, 2022, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, which 21 were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 23. Petitioner has 23 not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 25 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed 26 de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law 27 by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court 28 ///// 1 | ....°). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be 2 || supported by the record and by the proper analysis. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The findings and recommendations issued March 8, 2022 (ECF No. 23), are adopted 5 | in full; 6 2. This action is dismissed for failure to prosecute and for failure to obey court 7 || orders. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Local Rule 110, 8 3. Respondent’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 11) is denied as moot, 9 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case, and 10 5. The court declines to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. 11 | § 2253. 12 | DATED: July 11, 2022. 13 14 ee 3 CHIEF ED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28