(PC) Clark v. Ciolli ( 2022 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WILLIE DWAYNE CLARK, Case No. 1:21-cv-01081-SKO (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S 13 v. MOTION TO STOP COLLECTIONS OF FILING FEE DEDUCTIONS FROM 14 ANDREW CIOLLI, et al., INMATE TRUST ACCOUNT 15 Defendants. (Doc. 13) 16 17 Plaintiff Willie Dwayne Clark is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil 18 action brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of 19 Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). 20 I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND 21 On March 4, 2022, this Court issued its “Order Clarifying Status of Filing Fee Payments 22 Collected and Credited.” (Doc. 12.) The Court found a total of $287.94 had been collected and 23 credited toward Plaintiff’s payment of the filing fee in this action, and $62.06 remained to be 24 paid. (Id. at 2.)1 25 On July 6, 2022, Plaintiff filed correspondence dated and signed June 28, 2022, which 26 was docketed as a motion to stop deductions from trust account due to filing fee paid in full. 27 1 The payments credited as of 3/4/22 were as follows: (1) $40.00 on 9/21/21; ((2) $144.07 on 10/1/21; (3) 1 (Doc. 13.) Plaintiff contends he has paid the entire $350 filing fee, yet the prison continues to 2 deduct funds from his inmate account toward payment of that filing fee. (Id.) 3 II. DISCUSSION 4 A review of Plaintiff’s action and information collected from this Court’s finance 5 department officials reveals Plaintiff has in fact met his obligation regarding payment of the filing 6 fee in this matter. Payment history documentation indicates Plaintiff has overpaid in the sum of 7 $116.40 and actions have been undertaken by the finance department to issue Plaintiff a refund. 8 Plaintiff’s motion indicates that he has been advised by prison officials that payments will 9 continue to be deducted from his inmate trust account until the prison receives an order from this 10 Court “stating the fees are paid in full.” (Doc. 13.) 11 Because the Court’s records confirm that Plaintiff has paid the $350 filing fee in full, 12 prison officials should cease deducting payments from Plaintiff’s inmate trust account for an 13 obligation that no longer exists. 14 III. CONCLUSION AND ORDER 15 For the reasons stated above, this Court FINDS Plaintiff has paid the $350 filing fee in 16 full. As a result, the United States Penitentiary in Atwater, California SHALL cease deducting 17 funds from Plaintiff’s inmate trust account to pay the filing fee in this action, as Plaintiff is no 18 longer financially obligated to this Court. 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 21 Dated: July 11, 2022 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto . UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 22 23 24 25 26 27