(PC) Witt v. Trinity Feeding ( 2022 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTHONY JAMAL WITT, No. 2:21-cv-02229-TLN-CKD 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 TRINITY FEEDING, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The 18 matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and 19 Local Rule 302. 20 On April 15, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 21 were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings 22 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 14. ) Plaintiff has not 23 filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 25 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 26 See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed 27 the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by 28 the magistrate judge’s analysis. 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed April 15, 2022, (ECF No. 14), are adopted in 3 | full; and 4 2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice. 5 | DATED: July 8, 2022 6 7 ( f / g “ ! / Vso 9 Troy L. Nunley ] 0 United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28