(PC) Develter v. Craven ( 2023 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KARL WILLIAM DEVELTER, No. 2:22-cv-1389 KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER & FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS 14 CRAVEN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 By order filed March 20, 2023, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave 18 to file an amended complaint was granted. On April 20, 2023, 2023, the order was re-served on 19 plaintiff. Thirty days from that date have expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended 20 complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 21 Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copies of the order were returned, plaintiff 22 was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current 23 address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of 24 the party is fully effective. 25 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court 26 assign a district court judge to this case; and 27 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See 28 Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). ] These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 2 || assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen after 3 || being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with 4 || the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and 5 || Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time 6 || waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 7 | 1991). 8 | Dated: May 24, 2023 Foci) Aharon 10 KENDALL J. NE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1] /devel389.fia.nca 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28