(PC) Aguilar v. Amador County Sheriff's Dept. ( 2023 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARCO AGUILAR, No. 2:22-cv-02013 WBS DB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS 14 AMADOR COUNTY SHERIFF’s DEPARTMENT, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 By order filed August 9, 2023, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to 20 file an amended complaint was granted. Thirty days from that date have now passed, and 21 plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 22 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 23 prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 24 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 25 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 26 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 27 with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 28 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that 1 | failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District 2 | Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 3 || Dated: September 29, 2023 DLB7 ( Kota? S |] agui2013.tta BORAH BARNES 6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28