(PC) Glover v. Middleton ( 2023 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LARRY ROBERT GLOVER, No. 2: 23-cv-1767 KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER & FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS 14 MIDDLETON, 15 Defendant. 16 17 By order filed September 28, 2023, plaintiff was granted thirty days to file a complaint. 18 Thirty days from that date have passed, and plaintiff has not filed a complaint, or otherwise 19 responded to the court’s order. 20 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall appoint a 21 district judge to this action; and 22 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See 23 Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 24 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 25 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 26 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 27 with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 28 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that 1 | failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District 2 | Court’s order. Martinez v. Yist, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 3 | Dated: November 3, 2023 ' Foci) Aharon 5 KENDALL J. NE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 Glov1767.fta 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28