(PC) Spears v. El Dorado County Jail ( 2022 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LAUREN SPEARS, No. 2:21-cv-1458 KJM AC P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 EL DORADO COUNTY JAIL, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided 19 by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On June 14, 2022, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, which were 21 served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and 22 recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 16. As of July 14, 2022, 23 plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 25 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed 26 de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law 27 by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court 28 ///// 1 | ....°). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be 2 || supported by the record and by the proper analysis. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. Plaintiffs motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 13) is DENIED as moot; 5 2. The findings and recommendations issued June 14, 2022 (ECF No. 16), are 6 | ADOPTED in full, and 7 3. This matter is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute. See Local Rule 8 | 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 9 | DATED: July 14, 2022. 10 1 ( tied ¢ q_/ CHIEF NT] ED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28