Munoz v. R.M. Galicia, Inc. ( 2023 )


Menu:
  • 1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 MIGUEL ANGEL MUNOZ, CASE NO. 1:22-CV-0842 AWI BAM 9 Plaintiff ORDER CLOSING CASE IN LIGHT OF STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH 10 v. PREJUDICE 11 R. M. GALICIA, INC. d/b/a Progressive Management Systems, (Doc. No. 19) 12 Defendant 13 14 15 On December 8, 2022, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss this case with prejudice, but 16 with a request for the Court to retain jurisdiction. See Doc. No. 19. The stipulation is made 17 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(i)(A)(ii). See id. 18 Rule 41(a)(1), in relevant part, reads: 19 (A) . . . the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: (i) a 20 notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment; or (ii) a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who 21 have appeared. . . . (B) Unless the notice or stipulation states otherwise, the dismissal is without prejudice. 22 Dismissals under Rule 41(a)(1)(A), when properly filed, are effective immediately and do not 23 24 require a court order/court approval. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1); Yesh Music v. Lakewood 25 Church, 727 F.3d 356, 362 (5th Cir. 2013); Commercial Space Mgmt. Co. v. Boeing Co., 193 F.3d 26 1074, 1077 (9th Cir. 1999); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997); In re 27 Wolf, 842 F.2d 464, 466 (D.C. Cir. 1989). 28 I Here, the parties in this case have signed the stipulated dismissal. See Doc. No. 19. 9, | Because all appearing parties have signed the stipulated dismissal with prejudice, this case has 3 terminated automatically. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); Yesh Music, 727 F.3d at 362; 4 | Commercial Space, 193 F.3d at 1077. > Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk is to CLOSE this case in light of the ° parties’ filed and properly signed Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(1) Stipulation Of Dismissal with prejudice, but as stipulated by the parties, the Court will retain jurisdiction in order to enforce, if necessary, the 9 terms of the settlement agreement. 10 11 IS SO ORDERED. 2p 12 Dated: _ January 24, 2023 7 Sz, 7 Cb Lec 3 "SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Document Info

Docket Number: 1:22-cv-00842

Filed Date: 1/25/2023

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/20/2024