(PC) Young v. Covello ( 2022 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JERRY WAYNE YOUNG, No. 2:22-cv-00055-JAM-CKD 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 PATRICK COVELLO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 By order filed May 31, 2022, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to 18 file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has 19 not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 20 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 21 prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 22 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 23 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 24 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 25 with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 26 and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 27 //// 28 //// 1] || time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 2 | (9th Cir. 1991). 3 | Dated: July 21, 2022 Card ft | / L , — 4 CAROLYNK.DELANEY 5 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 1] 12/youn0055.fta.docx 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28