(PS) Lohbeck v. Experian ( 2023 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 STEPHEN LOHBECK, Case No. 2:22-cv-01550-KJM-JDP (PS) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 On December 29, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which 19 were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and 20 recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. 21 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 22 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed 23 de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law 24 by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court 25 . . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be 26 supported by the record and by the proper analysis. 27 ///// 28 ///// ] Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed December 29, 2022, are adopted; 3 2. This action is dismissed for failure to prosecute, failure to comply with court orders, 4 | and failure to comply with the court’s local rules; 5 3. Defendant’s motion to dismiss, ECF No. 4, is denied as moot; and 6 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. 7 | DATED: January 27, 2023. 8 9 l ti / ¢ q_/ 10 CHIEF NT] ED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28