(PC) Fannin v. Shasta County Jail ( 2022 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHRISTOPHER LEE FANNIN, No. 2:21-CV-1245-WBS-DMC-P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 SHASTA COUNTY JAIL, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 18 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 6, 2022, the Court directed Plaintiff to resolve the fee status for this 19 case within 30 days. Plaintiff was warned that failure to resolve the fee status may result in 20 dismissal of this action for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders. 21 See Local Rule 110. To date, Plaintiff has not complied. 22 Based on the foregoing, the undersigned recommends that this action be dismissed, 23 without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders. 24 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District 25 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within 14 days 26 after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 27 objections with the court. Responses to objections shall be filed within 14 days after service of 28 objections. Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal. See 1 | Martinez v. Yist, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 2 3 | Dated: July 25, 2022 Sx