Nationstar Mortgage LLC v. Presley ( 2023 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC, Case No. 1:20-cv-00620-JLT-CDB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE 13 v. DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 14 ROBERT PRESLEY, et al. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 15 Defendants. (Doc. 80) 16 17 Plaintiff Nationstar Mortgage LLC (“Plaintiff”) commenced this action with the filing of 18 a complaint on April 30, 2020, in which it asserted causes of action against Defendants Robert 19 Presley, Healing My People Services (“HMP”), Joyce Decormier, Joe McHaney, Nikola Gulan, 20 and Doe Defendants for violations of the Racketeering Influenced Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 21 U.S.C. § 1961 et seq. and state statutes. (Doc. 1). 22 On July 27, 2021, the Court granted Defendant McHaney and Decormier’s motions to 23 dismiss, finding that Plaintiff’s complaint failed to state any cognizable claims. (Doc. 41). 24 Plaintiff filed its first amended complaint on August 24, 2021. (Doc. 42). On May 16, 2022, the 25 Court granted Defendant McHaney’s second motion to dismiss, again finding that Plaintiff’s 26 operative complaint failed to state any cognizable claims. (Docs. 58, 59). The Court granted 27 Plaintiff a “last opportunity” to replead its claims based on counsel’s representations that it could include “a number of additional supportive facts.” (Doc. 59 at p. 9). 1 Instead of filing a second amended complaint, Plaintiff filed as to Defendant McHaney a 2 | notice of voluntary dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)G). (Doc. 61). On November 10, 3 | 2022, Plaintiff filed a motion for default judgment as to the remaining Defendants for whom the 4 | Clerk of Court had entered defaults. (Doc. 68). 5 On January 6, 2023, the undersigned issued Findings and Recommendations that 6 | Plaintiff's motion for default judgment be denied and the case dismissed with prejudice, finding 7 | that Plaintiff failed to advance any cognizable claim against any Defendant and that any 8 | amendment would be futile. (Doc. 80). Plaintiff did not file any objections to the Findings and 9 | Recommendations within the 14 days allowed. 10 On January 23, 2023, Plaintiff filed its second notice of voluntary dismissal pursuant to 11 | Rule 41(a)(1)(A)Q) as to the “entire action.” (Doc. 81). In light of the notice, this action has 12 | been terminated, Comm. Space Mgmt. Co.., Inc. v. Boeing Co., Inc., 193 F.3d 1074, 1077-78 (9th 13 | Cir. 1999), and has been dismissed without prejudice and without an award of costs or attorneys’ 14 | fees. 15 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY DIRECTED to CLOSE the file in this 16 | case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 17 | 41(a)(1)(A)Q@). 18 [T IS SO ORDERED. ) Dated: _ January 30, 2023 | Wr bo 20 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28