(HC)Singh v. Pfeiffer ( 2023 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RAGHVENDRA SINGH, Case No. 2:21-cv-01731-TLN-JDP 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER 14 CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, proceeding pro se, has filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus 18 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge 19 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On November 30, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Petitioner has filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 25 Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 26 Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 27 analysis. 28 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed November 30, 2022, are ADOPTED IN 3 | FULL; 4 2. Respondent’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 28) is GRANTED and the petition is 5 | DISMISSED under the abstention doctrine in Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971); 6 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case; and 7 4. The Court declines to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. 8 | § 2253. 9 | DATED: January 30, 2023 10 /) “ \/ of bw 12 2 ON Troy L. Nunley» } 13 United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28