(PS)Mudaliar v. Prasad ( 2022 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SASHI R. MUDALIAR, No. 2:22-cv-01034-TLN-JDP 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 RAJESH PRASAD, 15 Defendant. 16 17 On July 12, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 18 were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and 19 recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 3.) No objections were filed. 20 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 21 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 22 See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the 23 magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”). 24 Having reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by 25 the record and by the proper analysis. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: 2 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed July 12, 2022 (ECF No. 3) are ADOPTED 3 | in full; and 4 2. This case is remanded sua sponte to the Superior Court of California in and for the 5 | County of Sacramento. 6 | DATED: August 9, 2022 7 ry /) “ 10 United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28