(PC) Ramos v. Mayfield ( 2022 )

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 LEOBARDO ERIC RAMOS, Case No. 1:21-cv-01036-DAD-EPG (PC) 8 Plaintiff, SCHEDULING ORDER 9 Exhaustion Motions: November 4, 2022 10 v. Doe Identification 11 Deadline: December 2, 2022 12 Motions to Compel: January 13, 2023 MAYFIELD, et al., 13 Report Re: Settlement Conference: February 17, 2023 Defendant(s). 14 Non-expert 15 Discovery: March 31, 2023 16 Dispositive Motions: May 5, 2023 17 This Court now sets a schedule for this action through the filing of dispositive motions. 18 I. DISCOVERY PROCEDURES 19 Discovery is now open and the parties are granted leave to serve discovery requests. 20 Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 1, 16, and 26-36, discovery shall proceed as follows: 21 1. The parties may take the following types of discovery from other parties: 22 a. Interrogatories (an interrogatory is a written question or request for 23 information and “may relate to any matter that may be inquired into under 24 Rule 26(b).” Fed. R. Civ. P. 33(a)(2)); 25 b. Requests for Production (a request for production is a written request that the 26 opposing party produce documents or electronically stored information, 27 “including writings, drawings, graphs, charts, photographs, sound recordings, 28 1 images, and other data or data compilations,” or a written request that the 2 opposing party produce any designated tangible things. Fed. R. Civ. P. 3 34(a)(1)); 4 c. Requests for Admissions (a request for admission is a written request that the 5 opposing party “admit, for purposes of the pending action only, the truth of 6 any matters within the scope of Rule 26(b)(1)” that relate to “(A) facts, the 7 application of law to fact, or opinions about either; [or] (B) the genuineness 8 of any described documents.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 36(a)(1)); and 9 d. Depositions (a deposition is where one party (or that party’s counsel) 10 questions someone under oath, and a court reporter is present to record the 11 proceedings).1 12 1. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(a)(2)(B), 13 Defendant(s) may depose any witness confined in a prison on the 14 condition that, at least fourteen (14) days before such a deposition, 15 Defendant(s) serve all parties with the notice required by Federal 16 Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(1). Plaintiff’s failure to participate in 17 a properly noticed deposition could result in sanctions against 18 Plaintiff, including monetary sanctions and/or dismissal of this 19 case. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(4), the 20 parties may take any deposition under this section by video 21 conference without a further motion or order of the Court. 22 2. If Plaintiff wishes to take a deposition, Plaintiff must file a motion 23 requesting permission to do so, specifically showing the ability to 24 comply with the applicable Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by 25 providing the name of the person to be deposed, the name and 26 address of the court reporter who will take the deposition, the 27 1 “Instead of participating in the oral examination, a party may serve written questions in a sealed envelope on the party noticing the deposition, who must deliver them to the officer. The officer must ask the deponent those 28 questions and record the answers verbatim.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(c)(3). 1 estimated cost for the court reporter’s time and the recording, and 2 the source of funds for payment of that cost. Plaintiff bears the 3 responsibility to pay the costs of the deposition, including the cost 4 of copies of deposition transcript(s).2 5 2. A party may serve on any other party no more than 15 interrogatories, 15 requests for 6 production of documents, and 15 requests for admission. If a party wishes to serve 7 additional discovery requests, that party may file a motion for additional discovery 8 requests with the Court, explaining why additional discovery requests are necessary. 9 3. Discovery requests and responses should be sent to the opposing part(ies), or their 10 counsel if represented. They should not be filed with the Court. 11 4. Responses to written discovery requests shall be due forty-five (45) days after the 12 request is first served. Boilerplate objections are disfavored and may be summarily 13 overruled by the Court. Responses to document requests shall include all documents 14 within a party’s possession, custody, or control. Fed. R. Civ. P. 34(a)(1). Documents 15 are deemed to be within a party’s possession, custody, or control if the party has actual 16 possession, custody, or control thereof, or the legal right to obtain the property on 17 demand. If Defendant(s) cannot obtain documents from Plaintiff’s institution(s) of 18 confinement, Defendant(s) shall clearly respond that a third party subpoena will be 19 necessary to obtain documents from Plaintiff’s institution(s) of confinement. 20 5. If any party or third party withholds a document on the basis of privilege, that party or 21 third party shall provide a privilege log to the requesting party identifying the date, 22 author, recipients, general subject matter, and basis of the privilege within thirty (30) 23 days after the date that responses are due. Failure to provide a privilege log within this 24 time shall result in a waiver of the privilege. Additionally, if a party is claiming a 25 right to withhold witness statements and/or evidence gathered from investigation(s) 26 into the incident(s) at issue in the complaint based on the official information privilege 27 2 The Court may request input from Plaintiff’s institution of confinement to determine if the deposition(s) 28 can proceed in a safe and secure manner before ruling on a motion for a deposition. 1 or confidentiality, the withholding party shall submit the withheld witness statements 2 and/or evidence to the Court for in camera review, along with an explanation of why 3 the witness statements and/or evidence should be withheld.3 The witness statements 4 and/or evidence shall be Bates stamped, and mailed to Judge Grosjean at 2500 Tulare 5 Street, Sixth Floor, Fresno, CA 93721. The withholding party shall also file and serve 6 a notice that they have complied with this order. All other claims of privilege may be 7 challenged via a motion to compel. 8 6. If Plaintiff seeks documents from someone who is not a party in this case, Plaintiff 9 must file a request for the issuance of a subpoena duces tecum with the Court. In any 10 request for a subpoena, Plaintiff must: (1) identify the documents sought and from 11 whom; (2) explain why the documents are relevant to the claims in this case; and (3) 12 make a showing in the request that the records are only obtainable through a third 13 party. If the Court approves the request, it may issue Plaintiff a subpoena duces 14 tecum, commanding the production of documents from a non-party, and may 15 command service of the subpoena by the United States Marshals Service. Fed. R. Civ. 16 P. 45; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). As defendant Mayfield has indicated that “[a] third-party 17 subpoena may be necessary to obtain the reports related to the investigation and 18 interviews conducted concerning Plaintiff’s allegations of excessive or unnecessary 19 use of force, as Defendant is not in possession, custody or control of these 20 3 See Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81, 94-95 (2006) (“[P]roper exhaustion improves the quality of those 21 prisoner suits that are eventually filed because proper exhaustion often results in the creation of an administrative record that is helpful to the court. When a grievance is filed shortly after the event giving rise to the grievance, 22 witnesses can be identified and questioned while memories are still fresh, and evidence can be gathered and preserved.”). 23 The “common law governmental privilege (encompassing and referred to sometimes as the official or state secret privilege) . . . is only a qualified privilege, contingent upon the competing interests of the requesting litigant 24 and subject to disclosure. . . .” Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Ct. for N. Dist. of Cal., 511 F.2d 192, 198 (9th Cir. 1975) (citations omitted). The Ninth Circuit has since followed Kerr in requiring in camera review and a balancing of interests in 25 ruling on the government’s claim of the official information privilege. See, e.g., Breed v. U.S. Dist. Ct. for N. Dist. of Cal., 542 F.2d 1114, 1116 (9th Cir. 1976) (“[A]s required by Kerr, we recognize ‘that in camera review is a highly appropriate and useful means of dealing with claims of governmental privilege.’”) (quoting Kerr v. U. S. Dist. Ct. for 26 N. Dist. of Cal., 426 U.S. 394, 406 (1976)); Sanchez v. City of Santa Ana, 936 F.2d 1027, 1033-34 (9th Cir. 1990), as amended on denial of reh’g (Feb. 27, 1991), as amended on denial of reh’g (May 24, 1991) (“Government personnel 27 files are considered official information. To determine whether the information sought is privileged, courts must weigh the potential benefits of disclosure against the potential disadvantages. If the latter is greater, the privilege 28 bars discovery.”) (citations omitted). 1 documents,” (ECF No. 47, p. 3), Plaintiff may file a request for the issuance of a 2 subpoena duces tecum for these documents without first requesting them from 3 defendant Mayfield. 4 7. The parties are required to act in good faith during the course of discovery and the 5 failure to do so may result in the payment of expenses pursuant to Federal Rule of 6 Civil Procedure 37(a)(5) or other appropriate sanctions authorized by the Federal 7 Rules of Civil Procedure or the Local Rules. 8 8. The parties have until January 13, 2023, to file motion(s) to compel further discovery 9 responses. The motion(s) should include a copy of the request(s) and any response to 10 the request(s) at issue. The responding party may file a response to the motion no later 11 than twenty-one days from the date the motion is filed. If, after reviewing the 12 motion(s) and response(s), the Court determines that a hearing will be helpful, the 13 Court will set a hearing on the motion(s) to compel. 14 II. PAGE LIMITS AND COURTESY COPIES 15 The parties are advised that unless prior leave of the Court is obtained before the filing 16 deadline,4 all moving and opposition briefs or legal memoranda shall not exceed twenty-five (25) 17 pages. Reply briefs by the moving party shall not exceed ten (10) pages. These page limits do 18 not include exhibits. 19 Defendant(s) shall mail or deliver courtesy hard-copies of all motions over 10 pages in 20 length to the court at 2500 Tulare St., Room 1501, Fresno, CA 93721. Courtesy hard-copies shall 21 reflect the CM/ECF document numbers and pagination. 22 III. DOE IDENTIFICATION DEADLINE 23 As this case proceeds against a doe defendant (ECF No. 21), Plaintiff may request 24 documents from defendant Mayfield in order to identify the doe defendant. Plaintiff may also 25 request a subpoena duces tecum if this information is not available from defendant Mayfield. 26 Plaintiff has until December 2, 2022, to file a motion to substitute the named individual in 27 place of defendant Doe. If Plaintiff fails to identify defendant Doe by this deadline, defendant 28 4 Parties may seek leave by filing a short motion. 1 Doe may be dismissed from the case. 2 IV. NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINE 3 The deadline for the completion of all non-expert discovery is March 31, 2023. 4 V. EXHAUSTION MOTION DEADLINE 5 The deadline for Defendant(s) to present any challenge for failure to exhaust 6 administrative remedies is November 4, 2022. Failure to raise the exhaustion defense by this 7 deadline will result in waiver of the defense. See Albino v. Baca, 747 F.3d 1162, 1170 (9th Cir. 8 2014) (providing that the exhaustion question should be decided as early as feasible). 9 VI. DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS DEADLINE 10 The deadline for filing dispositive motions, including motions for summary judgment 11 (other than dispositive motions based on the defense of failure to exhaust administrative 12 remedies), is May 5, 2023. The deadline to file oppositions to dispositive motions, including 13 motions for summary judgment, is thirty days from the date the motion is filed. The deadline to 14 file replies to oppositions is fourteen days from the date the opposition is filed. If a party needs 15 an extension of any of these deadlines, that party may file a motion for an extension of time.5 16 If Defendant(s) file a motion for summary judgment, Defendant(s) shall simultaneously 17 provide Plaintiff with the notice and warning required by Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952 (9th 18 Cir. 1998). 19 VII. SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 20 The Court is not setting a settlement conference at this time. Defendant(s) shall 21 confer with Plaintiff,6 and no later than February 17, 2023, shall file a report indicating each 22 party’s position on whether a settlement conference would be productive.7 23 VIII. FURTHER DATES AND DEADLINES 24 If this case is still proceeding after dispositive motions have been resolved, or if no 25 26 5 If Plaintiff requests an extension due to a lack of law library access, he should attach his request for law library access and/or paging services, as well as the institution’s response to his request (if any), to his motion for an 27 extension of time. 6 The parties may confer by letter. 28 7 If the Court sets a settlement conference, the parties may request an extension of any remaining deadlines. 1 || dispositive motions are filed, the Court will set expert disclosure deadlines,® a telephonic trial 2 || confirmation hearing, pretrial deadlines, and a trial date. 3 | IX. EFFECT OF THIS ORDER 4 This order represents the Court’s best estimated schedule through dispositive motions. 5 || Any party unable to comply with the dates outlined in this order shall immediately file an 6 || appropriate motion or stipulation identifying the requested modification(s). 7 The dates set in this order are considered to be firm and will not be modified absent a 8 | showing of good cause, even if a stipulation to modify is filed. 9 Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions. 10 Wl IT IS SO ORDERED. | Dated: _ August 4, 2022 Isp hey 13 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 8 While the Court is not setting a deadline for expert disclosures at this time, the parties may provide their 28 || expert disclosures at any time.