(PC) Anderson v. Babcock ( 2024 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TERRANCE ANDERSON, No. 2:23-cv-2779-TLN-AC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 C.BABCOCK, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 By order filed December 13, 2023, plaintiff was required to submit an application to 18 proceed in forma pauperis or to pay the appropriate filing fee, and was cautioned that failure to do 19 so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now 20 expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order and has not filed the required 21 documents. 22 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be 23 dismissed without prejudice. 24 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 25 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 26 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 27 with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 28 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that 1 | failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District 2 || Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 3 | DATED: January 23, 2024 . . 4 Hthren— Lhor—e_ 5 ALLISON CLAIRE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28