(PC) Hossein v. Sheriff Police Dept. ( 2024 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ASSEM HOSSEIN, No. 2:23-cv-2002 KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 SHERIFF’S POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 By order filed November 28, 2023, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed, and thirty days 19 leave to file an amended complaint was granted. On January 3, 2024, plaintiff was granted an 20 additional thirty days in which to file an amended complaint. That thirty day period has expired, 21 and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 22 Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the order was returned, plaintiff 23 was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current 24 address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of 25 the party is fully effective. 26 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is 27 directed to assign a district judge to this case; and 28 //// ] IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 2 | 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 3 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 4 | assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days 5 || after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 6 || with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 7 || and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 8 | time waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th 9 || Cir. 1991). 10 || Dated: February 7, 2024 Aectl Aharon 12 KENDALL J.NE /hoss2002.fta UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28