(PC) Rojas v. County of Sacramento ( 2024 )


Menu:
  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROBERT EUGENE ROJAS, No. 2:22-cv-00962-KJM-DMC-P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 18 The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by Eastern District of 19 California local rules. 20 On November 6, 2023, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations, which 21 were served on the parties, and which contained notice that the parties may file objections within 22 the time specified therein. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed. 23 Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the findings and 24 recommendations was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to 25 keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service 26 of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. 27 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 28 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed 1 || denovo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law 2 || by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court 3 || ....”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be 4 | supported by the record and by the proper analysis. The court also adds under Local Rule 183(b), 5 || the court may dismiss an action without prejudice for failure to prosecute when a pro se party has 6 || failed to keep the court apprised of his or her current address. 7 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 8 1. The findings and recommendations filed November 6, 2023, are adopted in full. 9 2. This action is dismissed without prejudice for lack of prosecution and failure to 10 || comply with court rules and orders. 11 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this file. 12 | DATED: February 7, 2024. 13 14 eee 15 CHIEF ED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Document Info

Docket Number: 2:22-cv-00962

Filed Date: 2/8/2024

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/20/2024