(PC) LaTour v. Stockton Police Dept. ( 2024 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CORY DAVID LATOUR, No. 2:23-cv-1953 CKD 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 STOCKTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, et ORDER AND al., 15 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 17 18 On January 5, 2024, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed with leave to amend. The 19 amended complaint was due on February 5, 2024 and plaintiff has not filed an amended 20 complaint. 21 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district 22 court judge to this case; and 23 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See 24 Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 25 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 26 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 27 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 28 with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 1 | and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 2 || time waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th 3 || Cir. 1991). 4 || Dated: February 14, 2024 Card Kt | / py la 4 5 CAROLYN K DELANEY? 6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9} 1 10 lato1953.fta 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28