(PC) Brown v. Bugge ( 2024 )


Menu:
  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARK ANTHONY BROWN, No. 2:22-cv-2118 KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 B. BUGGE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 On January 11, 2024, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment pursuant to 18 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Plaintiff did not oppose the motion. 19 Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: “Failure of the responding party to file written 20 opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to 21 the granting of the motion . . . .” Id. On June 29, 2023, plaintiff was advised of the requirements 22 for filing an opposition to a motion and that failure to oppose such a motion may be deemed a 23 waiver of opposition to the motion. See Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 957 (9th Cir. 1998) (en 24 banc), and Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409, 411-12 (9th Cir. 1988). (ECF No. 22.) 25 Local Rule 110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules “may be grounds for 26 imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of 27 the Court.” Id. Failure to comply with the Local Rules may result in a recommendation that the 28 action be dismissed. 1 Finally, Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides: 2 Involuntary Dismissal; Effect. If the plaintiff fails to prosecute or to comply with these rules or a court order, a defendant may move to 3 dismiss the action or any claim against it. Unless the dismissal order states otherwise, a dismissal under this subdivision (b) and any 4 dismissal not under this rule--except one for lack of jurisdiction, improper venue, or failure to join a party under Rule 19--operates as 5 an adjudication on the merits. 6 | Id. 7 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty days from the date 8 | of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any, to the motion for summary judgment. 9 || Failure to file an opposition will be deemed as consent to have the: (a) action dismissed for lack 10 || of prosecution; and (b) action dismissed based on plaintiffs failure to comply with these rules 11 || andacourt order. Said failure shall result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed 12 || pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). 13 | Dated: February 13, 2024 A ef ate ebruary ( WN A. i f ih —, M4 CAROLYN K. DELANEY 15 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 16 17 /brow2118.nop 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Document Info

Docket Number: 2:22-cv-02118

Filed Date: 2/13/2024

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/20/2024