(PC) Suggett v. Solano County ( 2024 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 LAYLA SUGGETT, Case No. 2:23-cv-00907-TLN-JDP 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER 12 SOLANO COUNTY JUSTICE CENTER, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 16 Plaintiff, a county inmate proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief 17 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 18 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On January 16, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 which were served on Plaintiff, and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the 21 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. The time to file objections 22 has passed, and Plaintiff has not filed any objections. 23 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 24 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 25 See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the 26 magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”). 27 Having reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by 28 the record and by the proper analysis. 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed January 16, 2024 (ECF No. 11) are 3 ADOPTED IN FULL; 4 2. This case will proceed on Plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment claims for inadequate 5 medical care against Defendants Wong, Solano County, and Wellpath Medical; 6 3. All other claims are DISMISSED; and 7 4. This case is referred back to the assigned magistrate judge for all further pretrial 8 proceedings. 9 | Date: February 19, 2024 10 /) /) “ ! fb 12 Troy L. Nuhlep ] 13 United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28