Garza v. Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation ( 2024 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSE GARZA, No. 1:23-cv-01356-NODJ-SKO 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE TO THIS MATTER AND 14 CARGILL MEAT SOLUTIONS CLOSE THE CASE CORPORATION, 15 (Doc. 12) 16 Defendant. 17 18 On February 20, 2024, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing the action with 19 prejudice. (Doc. 12.) In light of the parties’ stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed. 20 R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has 21 been dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to assign a district judge 22 to this matter and thereafter close this case. 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 Dated: February 21, 2024 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto . 26 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 28