(PC) Singh v. Elk Grove Police Dept. ( 2024 )


Menu:
  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 GURPREET SINGH, Case No.: 2:23-cv-00647-DJC-CKD (PC) 14 Plaintiff, 15 v. ORDER 16 ELK GROVE POLICE DEPARTMENT, ET 17 AL., 18 Defendants. 19 20 On October 10, 2023, Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney issued an Order 21 and Findings and Recommendations, ECF No. 11, recommending that this action be 22 dismissed without prejudice. Objections to were due fourteen (14) days after service 23 of said findings and recommendations. The Clerk of Court mailed the Court's Order 24 and Findings and Recommendations to Plaintiff at his address of record. On October 25 24, 2023, the Clerk of Court was notified that the Court's Order was returned as 26 undeliverable. On December 12, 2023, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Change of Address in 27 another action pending in the Eastern District, case No. 2:23-cv-00237-KJM-KJN (PC). 28 On December 15, 2023, the Clerk of Court updated Plaintiff's address in this action. 1 Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is hereby DIRECTED to re-serve a copy of the 2 Order and Findings and Recommendations, ECF No. 11, on Plaintiff at his current 3 address. Within fourteen (14) days after being served with said findings and 4 recommendations, Plaintiff may file written objections with the Court. The document 5 should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and 6 Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the 7 specified time waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 8 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 9 Plaintiff is reminded that a party appearing in propria persona shall keep the 10 Court and opposing parties advised as to his or her current address. If mail directed 11 to a plaintiff in propria persona by the Clerk is returned by the U.S. Postal Service, and 12 if such plaintiff fails to notify the Court and opposing parties within sixty-three (63) 13 days thereafter of a current address, the Court may dismiss the action without 14 prejudice for failure to prosecute. See E.D. Cal. L.R. 183(b). 15 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. 17 18 Dated: February 23, 2024 /s/ Daniel J. Calabretta THE HONORABLE DANIEL J. CALABRETTA 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Document Info

Docket Number: 2:23-cv-00647

Filed Date: 2/23/2024

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/20/2024