(PS) Rogers v. Bonta ( 2024 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 KIM EDWARD ROGERS, Case No. 2:22-cv-01157-TLN-JDP 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER 12 ROB BONTA, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 16 The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 17 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On January 9, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and 18 recommendations herein which were served on the parties, and which contained notice that any 19 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No 20 objections were filed. 21 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 22 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 23 See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the 24 magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”). 25 Having reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by 26 the record and by the proper analysis. 27 /// 28 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed January 9, 2024 (ECF No. 30) 3 are ADOPTED IN FULL; and 4 2. Defendant Rob Bonta is DISMISSED without prejudice; 5 3. The Clerk of Court shall ADMINISTRATIVELY TERMINATE Defendant 6 Sanchez; 7 4. Defendant Cooper’s response to Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint is due no 8 later than twenty-one days of the electronic filing date of this Order; and 9 5. This case is referred back to the magistrate judge for further pre-trial proceedings. 10 Date: February 26, 2024 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28