(PC) Saintillus v. USA ( 2024 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHALONER SAINTILLUS, No. 2:23-cv-2138 WBS CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Defendants. 16 17 On January 16, 2024, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed with leave to amend. The 18 amended complaint was due on February 15, 2024, and plaintiff has not filed an amended 19 complaint. 20 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 21 prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 22 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 23 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 24 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 25 with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 26 and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 || time waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th 2 | Cir. 1991). 3 | Dated: February 29, 2024 Card Kt | / ye □□□ 4 CAROLYNK.DELANEY 5 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8] 1 9 sain2138.fta 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28