(PC) Khademi v. Attorney General of California ( 2024 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVOOD KHADEMI, No. 2:23-cv-2675 KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER & FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS 14 ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 By order filed February 9, 2024, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave 19 to file an amended complaint was granted. Thirty days from that date have now passed, and 20 plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 21 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall assign a 22 district judge to this action; and 23 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See 24 Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 25 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 26 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 27 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 28 with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 1 | “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that 2 || failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District 3 || Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 4 | Dated: March 15, 2024 Cad □ ke yy a 5 CAROLYNK. DELANEY 6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 |) knad2675.Fta 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28