(PC) Moody v. Scotland ( 2024 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 KAYSHON LAMONT MOODY, No. 2:22-cv-2020-TLN-DMC 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. ORDER 13 A. SCOTLAND, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 17 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern 18 District of California local rules. 19 On February 22, 2024, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 which were served on the parties, and which contained notice that the parties may file objections 21 within the time specified therein. (ECF No. 20.) The time to file objections has passed, and no 22 objections have been filed. 23 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 24 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 25 See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the 26 magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court ….”). 27 Having reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by 28 the record and by the proper analysis. 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 2 1. The findings and recommendations, filed February 22, 2024 (ECF No. 20), are 3 ADOPTED IN FULL; 4 2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice; and 5 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. 6 | Date: May 1, 2024 nN /) . ig (. Take 9 Troy L. Nunley> . } United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28