Rodriguez v. Trans Union, LLC ( 2024 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CARMEN RODRIGUEZ, Case No. 1:24-cv-00124-SAB 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING WHY SANCTIONS 13 v. SHOULD NOT ISSUE FOR FAILURE TO FILE SCHEDULING REPORT 14 TRANS UNION, LLC, MAY 17, 2024 DEADLINE 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 The initial scheduling conference in this matter was initially set for May 14, 2024. (ECF 19 No. 4.) On May 3, 2024, the Court issued an order continuing the scheduling conference to May 20 21, 2024. (ECF No. 8.) Pursuant to the order setting the mandatory scheduling conference, the 21 parties were ordered to file a joint scheduling report one full week prior to the scheduling 22 conference. (ECF No. 4 at 2.) No joint scheduling report has been filed in this action. 23 Local Rule 110 provides that “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with these Rules 24 or with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all 25 sanctions … within the inherent power of the Court.” The Court has the inherent power to 26 control its docket and may, in the exercise of that power, impose sanctions where appropriate, 27 including dismissal of the action. Bautista v. Los Angeles Cnty., 216 F.3d 837, 841 (9th Cir. 28 2000). 1 The Court shall require the parties to show cause in writing why sanctions should not 2 | issue for the failure to file a joint scheduling report in compliance with the Court’s January 26, 3 | 2024 order. (ECF No. 4.) 4 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 5 1. The parties shall show cause in writing no later than May 17, 2024, why 6 sanctions should not issue for the failure to file a joint scheduling report as 7 required by this Court’s January 26, 2024 order; and 8 2. Failure to comply with this order will result in the issuance of sanctions. 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. DAM Le 11 | Dated: _May 15, 2024 __ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28