- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTHONY DAVID GONSALVES JR., Case No. 1:24-cv-00516-EPG-HC 12 Petitioner, ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR 13 v. THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 SUPERIOR COURT ANTELOPE VALLEY, et al., 15 Respondents. 16 17 18 Petitioner Anthony David Gonsalves Jr. is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a 19 petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 20 Petitioner is currently incarcerated at California State Prison Solano in Vacaville, 21 California. (ECF No. 1 at 1.1) On April 22, 2024, Petitioner filed the instant petition for writ of 22 habeas corpus in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. (ECF 23 No. 1.) On April 30, 2024, the petition was transferred to this Court. (ECF Nos. 2, 3.) 24 In the petition, Petitioner appears to challenge his conviction and sentence in case number 25 MA4684-01 and states that the location of the sentencing court is the Antelope Valley 26 Courthouse in Lancaster, California. (ECF No. 1 at 2.) When a state prisoner files a habeas 27 petition in a state that contains two or more federal judicial districts, the petition may be filed in 1 either the judicial district in which the petitioner is presently confined or the judicial district in 2 which he was convicted and sentenced. See 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d); Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 3 426, 442 (2004) (quoting Carbo v. United States, 364 U.S. 611, 618, 81 S. Ct. 338, 5 L. Ed. 2d 4 329 (1961)). Petitions challenging the execution of a sentence are preferably heard in the district 5 where the inmate is confined. See Dunne v. Henman, 875 F.2d 244, 249 (9th Cir. 1989). 6 Petitions challenging convictions or sentences are preferably heard in the district of conviction. 7 See Laue v. Nelson, 279 F. Supp. 265, 266 (N.D. Cal. 1968). 8 Section 2241 states that a district court, “in the exercise of its discretion and in 9 furtherance of justice[,] may transfer” the habeas petition to another federal district for hearing 10 and determination. 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) (court may transfer any 11 civil action “to any other district or division where it might have been brought” for convenience 12 of parties or “in the interest of justice”). “Under the law of the case doctrine, the transferee court 13 should not revisit the transferor court’s characterization of the petition unless that 14 characterization was ‘clearly erroneous’ or would result in ‘manifest injustice.’” Muth v. 15 Fondren, 676 F.3d 815, 818 (9th Cir. 2012) (citing Christianson v. Colt Indus. Operating Corp., 16 486 U.S. 800, 817 & n.5 (1988)). 17 Here, the Southern District of California found that Petitioner’s “conviction occurred in 18 Kern County,” and Petitioner “is in custody in Riverside County.” (ECF No. 2-1 at 2.) However, 19 the Antelope Valley Courthouse in Lancaster, California is one of the locations of the Los 20 Angeles County Superior Court. See Courthouses, The Superior Court of California, County of 21 Los Angeles, https://www.lacourt.org/courthouse/info/atp (last visited May 17, 2024). Further, 22 Petitioner is currently incarcerated at California State Prison Solano in Solano County, which is 23 part of the Sacramento Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of 24 California. See L.R. 120(d). Based on the foregoing, the Court finds that the Southern District of 25 California’s characterization of the petition was erroneous. Petitioner appears to be challenging 26 his criminal conviction and sentence imposed by the Los Angeles County Superior Court, and 27 thus, the petition is preferably heard in the district of conviction, which is the Central District of 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is TRANSFERRED to the 2 | United States District Court for the Central District of California. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5! Dated: _May 17, 2024 [sf hey — 6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 4 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Document Info
Docket Number: 1:24-cv-00516
Filed Date: 5/17/2024
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 6/20/2024