(PC) Long v. Vasquez ( 2024 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KEVIN MICHAEL LONG, No. 2:23-cv-2893 KJM CSK P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 VASQUEZ, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 By an order filed April 8, 2024, plaintiff was ordered to pay, within thirty days, the 18 appropriate filing fee, and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation 19 that this action be dismissed. That time period has now expired, and plaintiff has not paid the 20 court’s filing fee, or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 21 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be 22 dismissed without prejudice. 23 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 24 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 25 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 26 with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned “Objections 27 to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file 28 objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 1 || Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 2 3 || Dated: May 21, 2024 Chm Spo (EL CHI S00 KIM 5 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 || //ong2893.fpf 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28