R. R. Donnelley & Sons Co. v. Pappas ( 2024 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 R. R. DONNELLEY & SONS No. 2:21-cv-00753 DJC AC COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, 11 Plaintiff, 12 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE v. 13 JOHN PAPPAS III, an individual, 14 MERILIZ, INC., dba DOME PRINTING, PMCORPORATE GROUP, INC. dba PM 15 PACKAGING, DOME PRINTING AND PACKAGING, LLC and DOES 1-10, 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 Plaintiff filed a motion for entry of default against corporate defendant Meriliz Inc. on 20 April 23, 2024. ECF No. 198. The motion argues that while Meriliz initially appeared and 21 participated in this matter, Meriliz has since failed to comply with the Court’s Orders and the 22 Local Rules, resulting in a complete lack of participation in these proceedings. ECF No. 198 at 3. 23 Importantly, the motion also notes that counsel for Meriliz withdrew, and while new counsel has 24 appeared on behalf of other defendants, Meriliz remains unrepresented. Id. at 4; see also ECF 25 No. 113. The motion correctly notes that under Local Rule 183, “[a] corporation or other entity 26 may appear only by an attorney.” See also, Rowland v. Cal. Mens Colony, Unit II Men’s 27 Advisory Council, 506 U.S. 194, 201- 02 (1993). Meriliz did not respond to the motion for entry 28 of default. ] Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant Meriliz Inc. is Ordered to Show 2 | Cause, in writing, no later than June 7, 2024, why the court should not grant the motion for entry 3 | of default and direct the Clerk of Court to enter default against Meriliz, Inc, exposing Meriliz Inc. 4 || to the potential for an entry default judgment against it. Appearance of counsel on behalf of 5 || Meriliz will discharge this order. 6 || DATED: May 29, 2024 ~ 7 Htttenr— Lhor—e_ ALLISON CLAIRE 8 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28