(PS) Legardy v. Unknown ( 2024 )


Menu:
  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FLETCHER LEGARDY, No. 2:23-cv-01055-TLN-SCR 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 UNKNOWN, 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a 19 United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 20 On April 19, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were 21 served on Plaintiff, and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and 22 recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 6.) The time to file objections 23 passed, and Plaintiff did not file any objections. 24 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 25 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 26 See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed 27 the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by 28 the magistrate judge’s analysis. 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations, filed on April 19, 2024 (ECF No. 6), are 3 ADOPTED IN FULL; 4 2. The Court DISMISSES this action without prejudice; and 5 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 | Date: September 16, 2024 cr } ° “ J bh ° Troy L. Nuhlep>- 1 10 United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Document Info

Docket Number: 2:23-cv-01055

Filed Date: 9/17/2024

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/31/2024