(PC) Good v. Shasta County Sheriff Dept ( 2024 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSHUA R. GOOD, No. 2:24-cv-1501 AC P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS 14 SHASTA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT., 15 Defendants. 16 17 By order filed June 13, 2024, the complaint was screened and found to not state a claim 18 for relief. ECF No. 6. Plaintiff was given thirty days to file an amended complaint and cautioned 19 that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Id. at 7. 20 Plaintiff then requested and was granted an extension of time to file an amended complaint. ECF 21 Nos. 8, 10. The deadline to file an amended complaint has now passed, and plaintiff has not filed 22 an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 23 Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the order was returned and that 24 plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 183(b),1 plaintiff was properly served. It is the 25 plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to 26 1 Local Rule 183(b) requires that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any 27 address change and permits dismissal of the action for failure to prosecute when a party does not update their address within sixty-three days after mail directed to the party is returned by the 28 postal service. Plaintiff’s time for compliance has passed. 1 |} Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. 2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall randomly 3 || assign a United States District Judge to this action 4 IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that the complaint be dismissed for failure to state a 5 || claim for the reasons set forth in the June 13, 2024 Screening Order (ECF No. 6). See L.R. 110; 6 || Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. 7 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 8 || assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days 9 || after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 10 || with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned “Objections 11 || to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file 12 || objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 13 || Martinez v. Yist, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 14 | DATED: September 16, 2024 ~ Cttt0 Lhar—e_ 13 ALLISONCLAIRE. 16 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28