(PC) Williams v. Prudhel ( 2024 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BOBBY JAMES WILLIAMS, No. 2:22-cv-2250 KJM CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 JOSHUA PRUDHEL, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 A suggestion of death upon the record pertaining to the death of plaintiff was filed on May 18 28, 2024. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(a), the court ordered that a motion for 19 substitution be filed no later than August 26, 2024. No motion has been filed. Accordingly, IT IS 20 HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed. 21 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 22 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 23 after service of these findings and recommendations, any written objections may be filed with the 24 court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and 25 Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be filed and served within fourteen 26 ///// 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 | days after service of the objections. Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive 2 | the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 3 || Dated: September 25, 2024 Card Kt | La Ly (g— 4 CAROLYN K.DELANEY 5 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8] 1 9 will2250. firs 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28