- 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 JOEY GARCIA, Case No. 1:24-cv-00616-SAB 10 Plaintiff, SCHEDULING ORDER (Fed. R. Civ. P 16) 11 Phased Discovery and Motion Deadlines: 12 v. Initial Disclosures: October 24, 2024 Pre-Certification Discovery: November 5, 2025 13 Certification Motion Filing: January 23, 2026 ADVANCED DRAINAGE Opposition and Reply: By Local Rule & Stipulation 14 SYSTEMS, INC., 15 Defendant. 16 17 I. Date of Scheduling Conference 18 The Scheduling Conference was held via videoconference on October 1, 2024. 19 II. Appearances of Counsel 20 Kasra Ramez appeared via video on behalf of Plaintiff. 21 Cory D. Catignani appeared via video on behalf of Defendant. 22 III. Consent to Magistrate Judge 23 The parties have not consented to magistrate jurisdiction. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), 24 to the parties who have not consented to conduct all further proceedings in this case, including trial, 25 before United States Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone, you should be informed that because of 26 the pressing workload of United States district judges and the priority of criminal cases under the 27 United States Constitution, you are encouraged to consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction in an 28 effort to have your case adjudicated in a timely and cost effective manner. Any criminal trial set 1 which conflicts with the civil trial will take priority, even if the civil trial was set first. Continuances 2 of civil trials under these circumstances may no longer be entertained, absent a specific and stated 3 finding of good cause, but the civil trial may instead trail from day to day or week to week until the 4 completion of either the criminal case or the older civil case. The parties are advised that they are 5 free to withhold consent or decline magistrate jurisdiction without adverse substantive 6 consequences. 7 IV. Initial Disclosure under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) 8 The parties shall complete the initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1), on or 9 before October 24, 2024. 10 V. Amendments to Pleading 11 The parties are advised that filing motions and/or stipulations requesting leave to amend the 12 pleadings does not reflect on the propriety of the amendment or imply good cause to modify the 13 existing schedule, if necessary. All proposed amendments must (A) be supported by good cause 14 pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) if the amendment requires any modification to the existing 15 schedule, see Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 609 (9th Cir. 1992), and (B) 16 establish, under Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a), that such an amendment is not (1) prejudicial to the opposing 17 party, (2) the product of undue delay, (3) proposed in bad faith, or (4) futile, see Foman v. Davis, 18 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962). 19 VI. Class Certification 20 The Court shall order a phased approach to this action. This first phase shall relate to class 21 certification. Any motion for class certification or motion to deny class certification shall be filed 22 on or before January 23, 2026. Opposition and reply briefs shall be filed in accordance with Local 23 Rule 230. The parties are encouraged to meet and confer at the appropriate time and submit a 24 stipulation expanding such briefing periods as necessary. 25 VII. Discovery Plan and Cut-Off Dates 26 The parties are ordered to complete all pre-certification discovery on or before November 27 5, 2025. 28 The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e) regarding a party’s duty to timely supplement 1 disclosures and responses to discovery requests will be strictly enforced. 2 The parties are cautioned that the discovery cut-off deadlines are the dates by which all 3 discovery must be completed. Absent good cause, discovery motions will not be heard after the 4 discovery deadlines. Moreover, absent good cause, the Court will only grant relief on a discovery 5 motion if the relief requested requires the parties to act before the expiration of the relevant 6 discovery deadline. In other words, discovery requests and deposition notices must be served 7 sufficiently in advance of the discovery deadlines to permit time for a response, time to meet and 8 confer, time to prepare, file and hear a motion to compel and time to obtain relief on a motion to 9 compel. Counsel are expected to take these contingencies into account when proposing discovery 10 deadlines. Compliance with these discovery cutoffs requires motions to compel be filed and heard 11 sufficiently in advance of the discovery cutoff so that the Court may grant effective relief within 12 the allotted discovery time. A party’s failure to have a discovery dispute heard sufficiently in 13 advance of the discovery cutoff may result in denial of the motion as untimely. 14 VIII. Pre-Trial Motions 15 Unless prior leave of Court is obtained at least seven (7) days before the filing date, all 16 moving and opposition briefs or legal memorandum in civil cases shall not exceed twenty-five (25) 17 pages. Reply briefs filed by moving parties shall not exceed ten (10) pages. Before scheduling any 18 motion, the parties must comply with all requirements set forth in Local Rule 230 and 251. 19 A. Non-Dispositive Pre-Trial Motions 20 As noted, all pre-certification discovery, including motions to compel, shall be completed 21 no later than November 5, 2025. Compliance with this discovery cutoff requires motions to compel 22 be filed and heard sufficiently in advance of the discovery cutoff so that the Court may grant 23 effective relief within the allotted discovery time. A party’s failure to have a discovery dispute 24 heard sufficiently in advance of the discovery cutoff may result in denial of the motion as untimely. 25 Non-dispositive motions are heard on Wednesdays at 10:00 a.m., before United States Magistrate 26 Judge Stanley A. Boone in Courtroom 9. 27 In scheduling any non-dispositive motion, the Magistrate Judge may grant Applications for 28 an Order Shortening Time pursuant to Local Rule 144(e). However, if counsel does not obtain an 1 Order Shortening Time, the Notice of Motion must comply with Local Rule 251. 2 Discovery Disputes: If a motion is brought under Fed. R. Civ. P. 37, the parties must 3 prepare and file a Joint Statement re Discovery Disagreement (“Joint Statement”) as required by 4 Local Rule 251. The Joint Statement must be filed fourteen (14) calendar days before the scheduled 5 hearing date. Courtesy copies of all motion-related documents, declarations, and exhibits must be 6 delivered to the Clerk’s Office by 10:00 a.m. on the fourth court day prior to the scheduled hearing 7 date. Motions will be removed from the court’s hearing calendar if the Joint Statement is not timely 8 filed or if courtesy copies are not timely delivered. In order to satisfy the meet and confer 9 requirement set forth in Local Rule 251(b), the parties must confer and talk to each other in person, 10 over the telephone or via video conferencing before the hearing about the discovery dispute. The 11 Court may issue sanctions against the moving party or the opposing party if either party fails to 12 meet and confer in good faith. 13 B. Dispositive Pre-Trial Motions 14 Motions for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication: Prior to filing a motion for 15 summary judgment or motion for summary adjudication, the parties are ORDERED to meet, in 16 person or by telephone, and confer to discuss the issues to be raised in the motion. 17 The purpose of the meeting shall be to: 1) avoid filing motions for summary judgment where 18 a question of fact exists; 2) determine whether the respondent agrees that the motion has merit in 19 whole or in part; 3) discuss whether issues can be resolved without the necessity of briefing; 4) 20 narrow the issues for review by the court; 5) explore the possibility of settlement before the parties 21 incur the expense of briefing a summary judgment motion; and 6) to arrive at a Joint Statement of 22 Undisputed Facts. 23 The moving party shall initiate the meeting and provide a draft of the Joint Statement of 24 Undisputed Facts. In addition to the requirements of Local Rule 260, the moving party shall 25 file a Joint Statement of Undisputed Facts. 26 In the Notice of Motion, the moving party shall certify that the parties have met and 27 conferred as ordered above or set forth a statement of good cause for the failure to meet and confer. 28 IX. Pre-Trial Conference and Trial Date 1 The pre-trial conference and trial date shall be addressed following completion of the pre- 2 certification phase. 3 X. Settlement Conference 4 Should the parties desire a settlement conference, they will jointly request one of the Court, 5 and one will be arranged. In making such request, the parties are directed to notify the Court as to 6 whether or not they desire the undersigned to conduct the settlement conference or to arrange for 7 one before another judicial officer. 8 XI. Related Matters Pending 9 The parties proffer they are unaware of any related cases. 10 XII. Compliance with Federal Procedure 11 All counsel are expected to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12 and the Local Rules of the Eastern District of California, and to keep abreast of any amendments 13 thereto. The Court must insist upon compliance with these Rules if it is to efficiently handle its 14 increasing case load and sanctions will be imposed for failure to follow the Rules as provided in 15 both the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules for the Eastern District of California. 16 Additional requirements and more detailed procedures for courtroom practice before United 17 States Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone can be found at the United States District Court for the 18 Eastern District of California’s website (www.caed.uscourts.gov) under Judges; United States 19 Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone (SAB). In the area entitled “Case Management Procedures,” 20 there is a link to “Standard Information.” All parties and counsel shall comply with the guidelines 21 set forth therein. 22 XIII. Newer Admitted Attorneys and Motions before Judge Boone 23 The Court reviews motions set for hearing and makes a determination whether to vacate the 24 hearing if the Court deems oral argument is unnecessary. See L.R. 230(g). Recognizing the value 25 and importance of training attorneys, for a motion set or to be set for hearing, the Court encourages 26 the parties to consider assigning the oral argument to an attorney with seven (7) years or less 27 experience out of law school. If any party provides notification that such an attorney from at least 28 one side will argue the motion, the Court will go forward with the hearing as scheduled. The parties 1 | shall place such notification within a separately entitled section after the conclusion of the 2 | motion, opposition, or reply briefing. If no party provides such notice, the hearing may be vacated 3 | without further notice. 4 XIV. Effect of this Order 5 The foregoing order represents the best estimate of the court and counsel as to the agenda 6 || most suitable to dispose of this case. The trial date reserved is specifically reserved for this case. 7 | Ifthe parties determine at any time that the schedule outlined in this order cannot be met, counsel 8 | are ordered to notify the court immediately of that fact so that adjustments may be made, either by 9 | stipulation or by subsequent status conference. 10 Stipulations extending the deadlines contained herein will not be considered unless 11 | they are accompanied by affidavits or declarations, and where appropriate attached exhibits, 12 | which establish good cause for granting the relief requested. The parties are advised that due 13 | to the impacted nature of civil cases on the district judges in the Eastern District of California, 14 | Fresno Division, that stipulations to continue set dates are disfavored and will not be granted 15 | absent good cause. 16 Lastly, should counsel or a party appearing pro se fail to comply with the directions 17 | as set forth above, an ex parte hearing may be held and contempt sanctions, including 18 | monetary sanctions, dismissal, default, or other appropriate judgment, may be imposed 19 | and/or ordered. 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. DAM Le 22 | Dated: _October 2, 2024 _ ee UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 23 24 25 26 27 28
Document Info
Docket Number: 1:24-cv-00616
Filed Date: 10/2/2024
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/31/2024