In Re: Prokop ( 2015 )

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ IN RE DAVID M. PROKOP ______________________ 2014-1423 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in serial No. 90/012,124. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ KEVIN A. ZECK, Perkins Coie LLP, of Seattle, Wash- ington, argued for appellant. With him on the brief was RAMSEY M. AL-SALAM. MARY L. KELLY, Associate Solicitor, United States Pa- tent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With her on the brief were Nathan K. Kelley, Solicitor, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, Deputy Solicitor, and FARHEENA Y. RASHEED, Associate Solicitor. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (WALLACH, TARANTO, and CHEN, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT January 12, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court