In Re: Deca International Corp. , 705 F. App'x 955 ( 2017 )


Menu:
  • Case: 17-136    Document: 14     Page: 1   Filed: 11/15/2017
    NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
    United States Court of Appeals
    for the Federal Circuit
    ______________________
    In re: DECA INTERNATIONAL CORP.,
    Petitioner
    ______________________
    2017-136
    ______________________
    On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United
    States District Court for the Southern District of Missis-
    sippi in No. 3:10-cv-708-TSL-RHW, Senior Judge Tom S.
    Lee.
    ______________________
    ON PETITION
    ______________________
    Before TARANTO, CHEN, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges.
    TARANTO, Circuit Judge.
    ORDER
    DECA International Corp. petitions for a writ of man-
    damus that would direct the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Mississippi to dismiss the case
    for improper venue. Specifically, DECA argues that the
    district court clearly abused its discretion in determining
    that its venue defense had been waived and that the
    Supreme Court’s decision in TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft
    Foods Group Brands LLC, 
    137 S. Ct. 1514
    (2017), did not
    Case: 17-136      Document: 14      Page: 2    Filed: 11/15/2017
    2                               IN RE: DECA INTERNATIONAL CORP.
    constitute an intervening change of law.            SkyHawke
    Technologies, LLC, opposes.
    We recently held that the Supreme Court’s decision in
    TC Heartland effected a relevant change of law and, more
    particularly, that failure to present the venue objection
    earlier did not come within the waiver rule of Federal
    Rule of Civil Procedure 12(g)(2) and (h)(1)(A). In re Mi-
    cron, No. 17-138 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 15, 2017). In light of that
    decision, we deem it the proper course here for DECA to
    first move the district court for reconsideration of its order
    denying the motion to dismiss. We therefore deny the
    petition for a writ of mandamus. Any new petition for
    mandamus from the district court’s ruling on reconsidera-
    tion will be considered on its own merits.
    Accordingly,
    IT IS ORDERED THAT:
    The petition is denied.
    FOR THE COURT
    /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
    Peter R. Marksteiner
    Clerk of Court
    s24
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2017-136

Citation Numbers: 705 F. App'x 955

Judges: Taranto, Chen, Hughes

Filed Date: 12/1/2017

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024