Neology, Inc. v. Kapsch Trafficcom Ivhs Inc. ( 2018 )

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ NEOLOGY, INC., Appellant v. KAPSCH TRAFFICCOM IVHS INC., KAPSCH TRAFFICCOM HOLDING CORP., Appellees ______________________ 2017-1228, 2017-1229 ______________________ Appeals from the United States Patent and Trade- mark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2015-00818, IPR2015-00819. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ ROBERT H. SLOSS, Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves and Sa- vitch LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by VICTOR FELIX, San Diego, CA. NATHAN S. MAMMEN, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washing- ton, DC, argued for appellees. Also represented by GREGG F. LOCASCIO. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (LOURIE, CLEVENGER, and STOLL, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT June 6, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court